Pages
- Home
- Mystery Series
- Bizarro, Fantasy & SF
- QUILTBAG...all genres
- Kindle Originals...all genres
- Politics & Social Issues
- Thrillers & True Crime
- Young Adult Books
- Poetry, Classics, Essays, Non-Fiction
- Science, Dinosaurs & Environmental Issues
- Literary Fiction & Short Story Collections
- Sookie Stackhouse/Southern Vampire Books & True Blood
- Books About Books, Authors & Biblioholism
Showing posts with label #2020Goals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #2020Goals. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
To celebrate the end of a long, long, bad, bad year...
...I'm going to make a new start on reviewing the books I liked, but don't feel called to perform a full review on. There are, without exaggeration, hundreds of books I'd like to alert people to, books that really deserve your eyeblinks, books I can happily if not enthusiastically encourage you to seek out. I just haven't had a framework to do it in, like the simple three-sentence review structure you see at right. That meme was posted by Author 'Nathan Burgoine on Twitter in 2019. He was, before becoming an author, a bookstore manager, and this is the structure he encouraged staff members who felt overwhelmed by the idea of Writing A Review to use.
I'm adopting it, and referring to the process as Burgoineing in the author's honor. (I hope he sees it as an honor.) I will fairly regularly, once or possibly twice a month as a baseline and more frequently as events warrant, post three- or four-Burgoined titles together. You can see I've already begun. In the next few days more Burgoines will appear, this being year-end and a perfect time to make the decks as clear as I possibly can for the *amazing* books I've already got in the works for 2021 reviews.
I have to give 2020 credit for one thing. While a lot of authors saw their book launches rescheduled, publishers canceled their tours, and everyone was hugely distracted by the nightmare of COVID-19 (I had it, you do not want it), no one can fault the astoundingly wonderful literature we got this year. My own annual six-stars-of-five read was Zaina Arafat's extraordinary debut novel YOU EXIST TOO MUCH (review lives here), a thirtysomething Palestinian woman telling me my life, my family, my very experience of relationships of all sorts. I cannot stress enough to you, this is the book you need to read in 2021. A sixtysomething man is here, in your email/feed, saying: This is the power. This is the glory. The writing I look for, the read I long to find, and all of it delivered in a young woman's debut novel. This is as good an omen for the Great Conjunction's power being bent to the positive outcomes as any I've seen.
I read fifty-seven books this quarter. That's nowhere near a personal best, but it's a lot more than I would've read if I hadn't had the bump that Burgoineing has given me! Liberation from the demands of making a deep dive into a book, instead being allowed by my own inner demons to enjoy then describe why I did that this vastly simpler and handily codified technique showed me. The reads were in the main first reads or review-induced second reads. The re-reads, mostly of old Agatha Christie stories or novels that I could blow through quickly because they're already familiar. At my age, I don't really want to devote a lot of time to rereading because, in the ~170-ish months I can expect to live, writers won't stop writing and publishers won't stop publishing. I see wonderful things, to paraphrase Howard Carter as he took in Tutankhamen's tomb goods.
Many of the most wonderful things I've seen in 2020 were translated things, What's Left of the Night quite possibly chief among them...or was it the first-ever translation from Yiddish of The Rivals & Other Stories, that dark and bitter draft of unsentimentalism about immigrant/emigrant Jewish life...permaybehaps it was The Slave Yards, that unexpected and welcome ray of hope centered in Benghazi. Those stories from far-away or long-gone places, more and more, have come to mean the most exciting reading I can do. New Vessel Press, Syracuse University Press, a raft of publishers are out there looking for and finding wonderful tales, translating them, and waiting for you to notice. I'd say it's a great year to set a challenge of reading a translation a month. Click on the tag "#2020Goals" and I'll bet you won't be at a loss of where to start for long.
There were some really pleasant surprises, like SHUGGIE BAIN winning the 2020 Booker Prize and selling over 200,000 copies. The Only Good Indians and Ring Shout appearing on endless "Best of 2020" lists. The Light Years appearing on my radar along with its mensch of an author, R.W.W. Greene. A good guy, one to watch, go follow him and see what a relief it is to have someone as classy and good-hearted as him imagining our future into being. Jennifer Marie Brissett, whose first novel Elysium I really loved, announced Destroyer of Light will come out in 2021, and Nicky Drayden's Symbiosis appears in February. On and on, a litany of things I look forward to, a long and happy and heartening trail of good news. I'm so grateful for it all, all the stuff there isn't room to celebrate here but there sure is room in my world for it!
On the other hand, I failed miserably at my goal of publishing an average of ten reviews a month in 2020. Months without reviews came largely because I was pretty miserable after I got this rotten COVID-19, and there are some long-term effects I'm not happy about but don't cause day-to-day killing fatigue and wretched headaches. I'm going to set the 2021 bar at fifteen reviews average per month...an ambitious one hundred eighty, more than I've managed since the earliest days of reposting reviews in the "Pages" to save them from being deleted (back in 2013, I had only Goodreads and LibraryThing as my review venues, and each had its issues). I'm a little bit anxious about that lofty goal, which is how it should be. Challenges, a little fear, and a whole new chance to make the 2020s rock instead of having them rock us.
Saturday, October 3, 2020
DEATH KEEPS HIS COURT, a Kindle Single about today's White House...I mean, Richard II's court! Heh. Of course I do.
DEATH KEEPS HIS COURT: The Rule of Richard II
ANSELM AUDLEY
$2.99 Kindle only, available now
Rating: 4 shiny stars of five
The Publisher Says: A tyrant on the throne...
Richard II was young, handsome, and elegant. Last living child of the brilliant Black Prince, he came to the throne bearing the hopes of his people on his shoulders. His court glittered; his tastes were refined; his portraits shone with gold. Regal, composed, aloof, he was the very picture of majesty.
He became a murderous, capricious tyrant. His favourites plotted against his family. He rewrote the laws of England to give himself absolute power. He raised an army against his own subjects.
His subjects deposed him. Twice.
This is the story of the forgotten civil war of 1387, which saw Richard set against his brave, ill-starred uncle Thomas of Woodstock. Of how a boy’s bright promise turned deadly, provoking his nobles to fear, flight, and finally open war. Of how a humiliated King set out on a course of vengeance which would cost him his life and sow the first fatal seeds of the Wars of the Roses.
From royal banquets to battles in the mist, Death Keeps His Court tells a tale of real-life tyranny, treachery and tragedy in the age which inspired A Game of Thrones.
Anselm Audley holds BA and Master’s degrees in ancient history from Oxford, as well as a degree in planetary science from University College London. He is a published fantasy novelist, the author of Heresy, Inquisition, Crusade, and Vespera.
My Review: Never, ever fail to believe a tyrant:
The King was the revolutionary, twisting law and justice into weapons, setting his own arbitrary whims above the settled custom of the realm, and giving not only protection but honours and riches to men whose conduct had been reprehensible. He had not the slightest respect for the laws of the land or the rights of his subjects, yet he was still the King – great Edward’s grandson and anointed monarch.When low, cunning men and women gain power, they bluster and threaten and posture. Good, reasonable people who want to believe the best of them say that they don't mean what they are saying.
To show his friendship and appreciation for his favourites, Richard had given them everything they had asked for. He had bent laws, misused his power as King for their benefit, made himself the friend of France and the enemy of his own people. He had protected them no matter what they did.They do. Always and without fail, they are truthful in their lies. What they intend to do is always in the bluster. And good people will never, ever believe them.
Thwarted, Richard instead resorted to one breach of faith after another: refusing to turn up to a council meeting, trying to delay the writs for Parliament, using every trick he could think of to keep the Appellants from acting. There could no longer be any doubt; de Vere was coming, and he had an army. All Richard’s delays, all his stratagems, had been attempts to buy time, to keep the Appellants’ eyes fixed on London.So, here we are!
Even now, it seemed, the King believed he had the power to make reality conform to his will. –and– Richard was incapable of forgiving and forgetting. His tender sense of his own regality, still bruised, was one reason.Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose, mes amis.
Wednesday, September 16, 2020
THE LAST SUMMER OF REASON, a beautiful tale of one rational man's losses to a manic mob mentality
THE LAST SUMMER OF REASON
TAHAR DJAOUT (tr. Marjolijn de Jager)
Introduction by Alek Baylee Toumi
Foreword by Wole Soyinka
Bison Books
$16.95 trade paper, available now
Rating: 3.75* of five
The Publisher Says: This elegant, haunting novel takes us deep into the world of bookstore owner Boualem Yekker. He lives in a country being overtaken by the Vigilant Brothers, a radically conservative party that seeks to control every element of life according to the laws of their stringent moral theology: no work of beauty created by human hands should rival the wonders of their god. Once-treasured art and literature are now despised.
Silently holding his ground, Boualem withstands the new regime, using the shop and his personal history as weapons against puritanical forces. Readers are taken into the lush depths of the bookseller's dreams, the memories of his now-empty family life, his passion for literature, then yanked back into the terror and drudgery of his daily routine by the vandalism, assaults, and death warrants that afflict him.
From renowned Algerian author Tahar Djaout we inherit a brutal and startling story that reveals how far an ordinary human being will go to maintain hope.
THIS WAS A BIRTHDAY GIFT (ALBEIT UNWITTING!) FROM A FRIEND. THANKS, YOUR KICKASSNESS!
My Review: First of all, let's clear up something that could cause a lot of people pleasure-robbing confusion: This is not a novel. It is a récit. The narrative is so limited in its focus that there is no sense of a world larger than itself, which makes the reader aware at all times that they are reading a narrative. This is not an insult or a criticism of the technique used, but of the marketing decision to call this a novel. It will disappoint novel-readers who buy it hoping for that immersive, multi-faceted experience of a story.
The Introduction by Toumi and the Foreword by Soyinka are essays fully worthy of reviews of their own. I will not be providing those reviews because I am not a scholar. The context they present is the infuriating context of the murdered Author Djaout's life and times. The facts of his all-too-brief life are on Wikipedia for monoglot English speakers. There is so much that US citizens have simply ignored or willfully shut out of their experience of the world, and as a result we seem to be willing to leap over high precipices to fall into fathomless oceans of rage and hatred, as Djaout warns his readers against. Boualem, his PoV character, is thrown over the edge willy-nilly, but he's got just enough time to form himself into an arrow.
The dive one takes while reading the book is deep, though, so don't think it's not profound and perception-altering to experience Boualem's deep dive into despair as his world, his entire life's work of defining and refining himself as a moral actor in that world, is fractured and flattened by a social earthquake. The depths of despair Boualem plumbs will be familiar to book-lovers watching the steady, pernicious, and malicious attacks on education, intelligence, and erudition we're seeing in the US.
I used up about half a can of Book Darts (may the goddesses please bless my kind friend Stephanie for gifting me this timely top-up of my supply for this past birthday!) marking beautiful passages to quote in my review. The lovely translation done by Translator de Jager is almost too rich a confection to be devoured in a sitting...but I did it. Yes, it was like a breakfast of rich brownies topped with lemon curd and served with a café viennoise, but it was also a heady experience of glorious phrase-making. I was Zooming with my Young Gentleman Caller while I was writing an earlier draft of this review. He said of my Book Darted copy, "I don't dare take it to the airport like that."
"Hmm?"
"It's got more hardware than a Goth biker."
Oh. Well, yes. Permaybehaps I'd better make the point sharper and more targeted:
That said, one is disinclined to hammer the hell out of the book because it was incomplete and fished out of the author's drawers after his murder. I know, and I can't explain how, that this book would've been absolutely earth-shattering had he lived, and had the chance to work with an editor to bring its many stregths and beauties into a finer, sharper focus. There is about this read the ozone smell and static crackle of greatness. The sadness that follows reading it is rooted in the sense that this promise is undelivered, in fact undeliverable, because Author Tahar Djaout was murdered by the pro-ignorance, anti-beauty forces that ran roughshod over his country.
Do not think the same can not happen here, happen again, happen to the resisters and artists and truth-tellers you're ignoring, skimming, marginalizing today. Vote Blue in November 2020 and allow Author Tahar Djaout's sacrifice of his life to be worthy.
TAHAR DJAOUT (tr. Marjolijn de Jager)
Introduction by Alek Baylee Toumi
Foreword by Wole Soyinka
Bison Books
$16.95 trade paper, available now
Rating: 3.75* of five
The Publisher Says: This elegant, haunting novel takes us deep into the world of bookstore owner Boualem Yekker. He lives in a country being overtaken by the Vigilant Brothers, a radically conservative party that seeks to control every element of life according to the laws of their stringent moral theology: no work of beauty created by human hands should rival the wonders of their god. Once-treasured art and literature are now despised.
Silently holding his ground, Boualem withstands the new regime, using the shop and his personal history as weapons against puritanical forces. Readers are taken into the lush depths of the bookseller's dreams, the memories of his now-empty family life, his passion for literature, then yanked back into the terror and drudgery of his daily routine by the vandalism, assaults, and death warrants that afflict him.
From renowned Algerian author Tahar Djaout we inherit a brutal and startling story that reveals how far an ordinary human being will go to maintain hope.
THIS WAS A BIRTHDAY GIFT (ALBEIT UNWITTING!) FROM A FRIEND. THANKS, YOUR KICKASSNESS!
My Review: First of all, let's clear up something that could cause a lot of people pleasure-robbing confusion: This is not a novel. It is a récit. The narrative is so limited in its focus that there is no sense of a world larger than itself, which makes the reader aware at all times that they are reading a narrative. This is not an insult or a criticism of the technique used, but of the marketing decision to call this a novel. It will disappoint novel-readers who buy it hoping for that immersive, multi-faceted experience of a story.
The Introduction by Toumi and the Foreword by Soyinka are essays fully worthy of reviews of their own. I will not be providing those reviews because I am not a scholar. The context they present is the infuriating context of the murdered Author Djaout's life and times. The facts of his all-too-brief life are on Wikipedia for monoglot English speakers. There is so much that US citizens have simply ignored or willfully shut out of their experience of the world, and as a result we seem to be willing to leap over high precipices to fall into fathomless oceans of rage and hatred, as Djaout warns his readers against. Boualem, his PoV character, is thrown over the edge willy-nilly, but he's got just enough time to form himself into an arrow.
The dive one takes while reading the book is deep, though, so don't think it's not profound and perception-altering to experience Boualem's deep dive into despair as his world, his entire life's work of defining and refining himself as a moral actor in that world, is fractured and flattened by a social earthquake. The depths of despair Boualem plumbs will be familiar to book-lovers watching the steady, pernicious, and malicious attacks on education, intelligence, and erudition we're seeing in the US.
I used up about half a can of Book Darts (may the goddesses please bless my kind friend Stephanie for gifting me this timely top-up of my supply for this past birthday!) marking beautiful passages to quote in my review. The lovely translation done by Translator de Jager is almost too rich a confection to be devoured in a sitting...but I did it. Yes, it was like a breakfast of rich brownies topped with lemon curd and served with a café viennoise, but it was also a heady experience of glorious phrase-making. I was Zooming with my Young Gentleman Caller while I was writing an earlier draft of this review. He said of my Book Darted copy, "I don't dare take it to the airport like that."
"Hmm?"
"It's got more hardware than a Goth biker."
Oh. Well, yes. Permaybehaps I'd better make the point sharper and more targeted:
Books—the closeness of them, their contact, their smell, and their contents—constitute the safest refuge against this world of horror. They are the most pleasant and the most subtle means of traveling to a more compassionate planet. How will Boualem go on living now that they have separated him from his books, his most invigorating nourishment? He is like a plant that has been torn from the soil, separated from liquid and light, its two vital necessities. He has been excluded from the life of books. He has been exiled from all the landmarks of his childhood: values, trampled, symbols corrupted, spaces disfigured and wrecked.That, my olds, is what's right and what's wrong with this récit. If you ran across the first two sentences in a novel, you'd think, "oo, that's pretty." Put the rest of the para behind it and you're in a récit not a novel, and one that needed a developmental editor's unkind attention. There is so very much of this sort of pretty, pretty phrasemaking that just goes on that little bit too long, that says what's already been said (“For books are more than books, they are the life, the very heart and core of ages past, the reason why men worked and died, the essence and quintessence of their lives.”–Cicero, b. 106BCE, and a famous enough quote that Author Djaout can reasonably be expected to have read it during his education) in a not hugely fresh way.
That said, one is disinclined to hammer the hell out of the book because it was incomplete and fished out of the author's drawers after his murder. I know, and I can't explain how, that this book would've been absolutely earth-shattering had he lived, and had the chance to work with an editor to bring its many stregths and beauties into a finer, sharper focus. There is about this read the ozone smell and static crackle of greatness. The sadness that follows reading it is rooted in the sense that this promise is undelivered, in fact undeliverable, because Author Tahar Djaout was murdered by the pro-ignorance, anti-beauty forces that ran roughshod over his country.
Do not think the same can not happen here, happen again, happen to the resisters and artists and truth-tellers you're ignoring, skimming, marginalizing today. Vote Blue in November 2020 and allow Author Tahar Djaout's sacrifice of his life to be worthy.
Friday, August 28, 2020
KALPA IMPERIAL, Argentinian woman-authored SF in translation (by SFF monadnock Ursula K. Le Guin!) CW for regressive sexuality politics
KALPA IMPERIAL: The Greatest Empire That Never Was
ANGÉLICA GORODISCHER (tr. Ursula K. Le Guin)
Small Beer Press
$8.69 ebook editions, available now
Rating: 3.75* of five
The Publisher Says: Emperors, empresses, storytellers, thieves . . . and the Natural History of Ferrets
Kalpa Imperial is the first of Argentinean writer Angélica Gorodischer’s nineteen award-winning books to be translated into English. In eleven chapters, Kalpa Imperial’s multiple storytellers relate the story of a fabled nameless empire which has risen and fallen innumerable times. Fairy tales, oral histories and political commentaries are all woven tapestry-style into Kalpa Imperial: beggars become emperors, democracies become dictatorships, and history becomes legends and stories.
But Kalpa Imperial is much more than a simple political allegory or fable. It is also a celebration of the power of storytelling. Gorodischer and acclaimed writer Ursula K. Le Guin, who has translated Kalpa Imperial, are a well-matched, sly and delightful team of magician-storytellers. Rarely have author and translator been such an effortless pairing. Kalpa Imperial is a powerful introduction to the writing of Angélica Gorodischer, a novel which will enthrall readers already familiar with the worlds of Ursula K. Le Guin.
My Review: In my honest opinion, the chapters here are stories. They're mostly self-contained, they have a storyteller...in my own mind, a single storyteller, with a really, really looonnnggg life...as a narrator to link them; but they're not chapters in a novel. These are the Thousand and One Nights of forgotten and uninquired-about empires, none exactly named but the people and the rulers and the inventors all carry their names with the heft and pride of the people you know in your everyday life. They're Egypt and India and Songhai and Qin and Mexica empires, all one immense and eternal entity called the empire and it's the largest that has ever been known.
Are they worth visiting? I have problems with Author Gorodischer's sexuality politics. I'm not surprised by that, but I am less than pleased. I'm unenthusiastic about the misandry; I'm not going to pretend the collection is perfect to try to sell the idea of reading it to you.
I will say that, if I overcame these issues and read the stories with varying degrees of agreement but always with the certainty that I was in the presence of very, very high-level art, I think you should be able to as well. Comme d'habitude, we shall employ the Bryce Method to experience the parts, now that I've briefly characterized the whole.
BOOK ONE: THE HOUSE OF POWER
The Emperor presents the foundation myth of an Imperial dynasty. The storyteller arrives and shows us his (stated explicitly on p14) vocal tics and verbal stylings.
The Two Hands is a polyphony of classes and stations, a mixing of the low and high in the Empire to tell of a man, a usurper, a creature of full manly vigor in contradistinction to his pathetic, weak, incapable usurped; Author Gorodischer has made it her purpose to tell fragments of a story in no special order and by doing so to reveal what the first voice, The Storyteller, knows and sticks to:
How vividly Author Gorodischer paints this impossible scenario. And, as all good stories develop, the changeless changes: A visitor, a ragged and dangerous leper, arrives to make the usurper's twenty-year-long reign of misery change, as the Archivist is privileged to tell us:
The End of a Dynasty or The Natural History of Ferrets Wow. What a novella. Secrets, lies, dishonorable shenanigans, cruelties so subtle they are only exquisite and not truly terrible, possessing an evil artistry to elevate them.
Stop laughing. I have so learned. Imperfectly, perhaps, but learned.
The storyteller regales the only barely willing ears of his audience with the growth of the tenth emperor into an adult over the course of a few short weeks. He is seven years old, trapped in a Gormenghastly nightmare of meaningless ritual and loveless display instead of intimacy; the others, rough beasts slouching toward Bethlehem, teach his blossoming inner man about realities of life and existence, give him a new identity (the ferret of the title), and ultimately unlock the rage he has borne since he was born.
Siege, Battle, and Victory of Selimmagud is distasteful, homophobic, and frankly indicative of qualities of mind that I saw in the relentless heterosexual binaries of Le Guin's famous The Left Hand of Darkness and the not-very-subtle homophobia of The Dispossessed (which so offended me that I actually erased it from my experience of the book until reminded of it in a recent guided re-read of the book). The uniformly victorious general of the Seventh Imperial Army of Assault is the "hermaphrodite" (or intersex, as we say these days) child of a lesbian Duchess and a gay Marshal. Because of course the Duchess of COLDWINTER would give birth to such a creature, as the General is portrayed as, in his slinky blond slenderness. Things go downhill from there. It taints my pleasure in this otherwise deeply pleasurable read.
Concerning the Unchecked Growth of Cities is as detailed, as lumbered with names as the begats in the Bible. Significantly more fun, however, and quite, in the end, a wry tale of life's innumerable Zen jokes. The storyteller tells us about the nature of History, Kleio not what's in old newspapers, the nature of the story of the past not the time gone by. So the storyteller sets us up in this universe, the History of the empire's multi-capital, as follows:
The storyteller is a wonderful and arch presence throughout the story.
But the ends of politics and religion, whether meshing or clashing, are as nothing compared to humankind's impulse to slaughter, destroy, wreck, wreak havoc upon, their fellow humans:
I don't blame them a bit.
BOOK TWO: THE GREATEST EMPIRE
Portrait of the Empress tells a lovely, fantasy-fulfilling tale of Virtue Rewarded. The Storyteller, bless him, revels in knowing secrets and telling tales; protest though he might about the Role of the Taleteller in spreading the word of the best, the worst, the rest of us, he is a creature of the Power that controls access to the world's powerful.
In the Great Empress's case, by being canny, astute, flexible enough to speak truth to Power without belaboring the point being made. By being honest, within reason, by telling someone whose life differed from her own by the most astonishing and appalling degree the home truths that all of us need to know. By being, at all times and in all ways, clear-sighted and pragmatic.
I assume, then, you won't be surprised to know that the Great Empress was no believer in majgickq:
Author Gorodischer posits a solution to the empire's ills that very much annoys me, one that I first encountered when I read Richard Sennett's urbanization-without-policing magnum opus The Uses of Disorder. Fifty years ago, he wrote this paean to the notion of urban libertarianism. The author here espouses a semi-urban libertarianism that makes me just as sick to my stomach. Gay people will most likely know why: The idea of a community setting its standards for itself, and enforcing them inside itself, is a recipe for persecution of the Other, the queer and different-colored and just different. Womyn-only spaces are safe! Unless you're some womon's tweenaged son. Black-only communities are safe! Unless you're trans. etc etc etc ad nauseam ad infinitum
There will never, utopian anarchists, be a day when it isn't someone's turn in the barrel.
And the Streets Empty is also unpleasant, containing revenge porn for women who are abused by men. Ableist, denigrates sex workers as so many of these stories do.
The Pool tells us of the many ways we lie to ourselves, for the best and worst of reasons, and become trapped in the illusions we create to hide our lies and their consequences from ruining our happiness. A doctor who practices his healing arts on Whiterose Street fails to accept the lies of the world, and so effects healing on his patients:
Perfect.
Basic Weapons in which the storyteller tells us of a man, one without legs but with a serviceable set of wheels, who conceives of an envious passion: He wishes to wheedle his way into a rich man's home. He does this by committing, repeatedly, the worst sin a being can commit: To use the existence of another for one's own profit.
Unless it's a hate-addicted legless bastard with a beautiful slave.
"Down There in the South" they say, "Not all is said; it hasn't all been said." And they are right, it hasn't and, I suspect, it can't all be said or there would be no more empire or villages or lakes bleeding rivers.
But there he goes, our not-the-worst-of-men, murdering cheating nobleman slowly with each step abrading away the false and brummagem from himself. He meets people, he learns their ways of doing and being in the world; he attacks no one, cheats nothing, arrives and leaves because coming necessitates going. He returns because parting means reunion. He is, simply put, never ever still but always being his way into becoming.
And what does our storyteller have to tell us about people who be their way into becoming? Why, that they become what they truly are and experience their life from the place they've readied themselves to occupy.
The Old Incense Road added little to the gestalt. The Cat, a brat, does bratty stuff while an old man, Z'Someone, growls and grumbles and everyone does a few different things and honestly, I have no idea how this one is different from any fantasy story in the world except it lacks the storyteller's arch, dry wit. Not the story I'd've gone out on; calling this a novel doesn't make it one and this would be a crap ending to a novel anyway, and as a collection, that wasn't a good outro.
Because this book is ***PERFECT*** for book clubs, there exists a handy-dandy reader's guide to spark discussions that should, most likely will, lead to much vigorous side-taking. Bracing, exciting discussions ahead!
ANGÉLICA GORODISCHER (tr. Ursula K. Le Guin)
Small Beer Press
$8.69 ebook editions, available now
Rating: 3.75* of five
The Publisher Says: Emperors, empresses, storytellers, thieves . . . and the Natural History of Ferrets
Kalpa Imperial is the first of Argentinean writer Angélica Gorodischer’s nineteen award-winning books to be translated into English. In eleven chapters, Kalpa Imperial’s multiple storytellers relate the story of a fabled nameless empire which has risen and fallen innumerable times. Fairy tales, oral histories and political commentaries are all woven tapestry-style into Kalpa Imperial: beggars become emperors, democracies become dictatorships, and history becomes legends and stories.
But Kalpa Imperial is much more than a simple political allegory or fable. It is also a celebration of the power of storytelling. Gorodischer and acclaimed writer Ursula K. Le Guin, who has translated Kalpa Imperial, are a well-matched, sly and delightful team of magician-storytellers. Rarely have author and translator been such an effortless pairing. Kalpa Imperial is a powerful introduction to the writing of Angélica Gorodischer, a novel which will enthrall readers already familiar with the worlds of Ursula K. Le Guin.
My Review: In my honest opinion, the chapters here are stories. They're mostly self-contained, they have a storyteller...in my own mind, a single storyteller, with a really, really looonnnggg life...as a narrator to link them; but they're not chapters in a novel. These are the Thousand and One Nights of forgotten and uninquired-about empires, none exactly named but the people and the rulers and the inventors all carry their names with the heft and pride of the people you know in your everyday life. They're Egypt and India and Songhai and Qin and Mexica empires, all one immense and eternal entity called the empire and it's the largest that has ever been known.
Are they worth visiting? I have problems with Author Gorodischer's sexuality politics. I'm not surprised by that, but I am less than pleased. I'm unenthusiastic about the misandry; I'm not going to pretend the collection is perfect to try to sell the idea of reading it to you.
I will say that, if I overcame these issues and read the stories with varying degrees of agreement but always with the certainty that I was in the presence of very, very high-level art, I think you should be able to as well. Comme d'habitude, we shall employ the Bryce Method to experience the parts, now that I've briefly characterized the whole.
BOOK ONE: THE HOUSE OF POWER
The Emperor presents the foundation myth of an Imperial dynasty. The storyteller arrives and shows us his (stated explicitly on p14) vocal tics and verbal stylings.
Well, well, I've let my words run away with me, something a storyteller should take care to avoid; but I've known fear, and sometimes I need to reassure myself that there's nothing to fear any more, and the only way I have to do that is by the sound of my own words.I suspect the truth of this isn't really that obvious to most of us in the privileged West. I suspect the tyrants' victims are the ones who know what fear so powerful that it enforces your silence on you is to be found more in places where the horror is physical, personal in the original sense "of the person or body," not virtual. No one should be bullied or threatened in our increasingly virtual world. But people whose speech can result in disappearance without return....
Well, you'll have to believe me when I tell you that once he'd sat in the seat of power, Bib became a giant. No, my friends, I don't mean that he grew taller or fatter. He was just as he'd been, smaller and shorter than most men of his age, but he thought intensely of himself not as an isolated person but as a part of something that no longer existed and that needed him in order to exist. And that, my friends, that's the kind of thinking that turns us into giants.The most wonderful observation of a character becoming A Character...the most complete presentation of a misfit's power to create a space to fit themself. The power of simply being yourself is always huge. The confidence to carve the world's resisting substance into a pedestal and clamber up on it is so rare. And that is exactly what this story of Antiquity, of a long-ago rebirth of Empire, and a dynasty no longer ruling, is about. Another and safer way to tell people that their uniqueness is their power in a society only recently out from under tyranny is to set it long, long ago and make it about a genuine hero...who might or might not have existed....
The Two Hands is a polyphony of classes and stations, a mixing of the low and high in the Empire to tell of a man, a usurper, a creature of full manly vigor in contradistinction to his pathetic, weak, incapable usurped; Author Gorodischer has made it her purpose to tell fragments of a story in no special order and by doing so to reveal what the first voice, The Storyteller, knows and sticks to:
The tale of {the usurper's} life and works is banal, sorry, and inconclusive. Have any of you ever gone near the imperial palace? Have you seen the towers, the immeasurable terraces, the black walls, the fountains? No, nor have I, and even now it's very hard to do so. That's why this story belongs to other people. I'm the one they give presents to and butter up to get me to tell about old, forgotten things. But this time, though it probably won't work, I'm going to try—why not?—to say nothing.And so the chorus begins, the Archivist, the chambermaid, the officer of the guard, the fisherman, all bring angles of the usurper's story that no one else could've seen or known to care about...and then, according to the above-quoted passage, comes our storyteller:
{The usurper} worked day and night, and under his rule good turned to evil with amazing speed. ... He was so busy that he ate and slept in the throne room, where officials brought the problems of the Empire to him and came away with ruinous solutions.A usurper, an illegitimate ruler, who wrecks whatever he touches? Goodness, that doesn't sound familiar at all, does it. I mean, it couldn't happen IRL could it, so we turn to fiction to explore the idea.
And then the woman who had been the empress died and was buried in the Garden of the Dead, and the Emperor shut himself up in her apartments...where he was alone.Utterly divorced from the reality of the realm he rules? No ruler could ever possibly enact that as a governing strategy! Seeing ever fewer ministers, finally none at all but communicating with them via notes left and returned, until people forgot what he actually looked like so were reduced to making up fearful tales of his nocturnal prowlings, resulting in a sense of eternal dread.
How vividly Author Gorodischer paints this impossible scenario. And, as all good stories develop, the changeless changes: A visitor, a ragged and dangerous leper, arrives to make the usurper's twenty-year-long reign of misery change, as the Archivist is privileged to tell us:
I know that it would be pleasing and suitable to say that his visitor was a mighty warrior or a great sorcerer, so that history could repeat itself and philosophers could draw conclusions from it. But what would become of the Annals of the Empire if we archivists started spinning fantasies like the storytellers? No. It was a beggar, lean, lousy, filthy, leprous.Call things by their proper names, people, and don't let anyone at all spin you a tale in place of giving you the facts. Devaluing truth and disparaging fact lead to bad, ugly, dark, rotten places. Don't forget this.
The End of a Dynasty or The Natural History of Ferrets Wow. What a novella. Secrets, lies, dishonorable shenanigans, cruelties so subtle they are only exquisite and not truly terrible, possessing an evil artistry to elevate them.
No, I'm sorry, but I can't tell you the name of the Ninth emperor of the Hehvrontes dynasty, because I don't know it. Nobody does. It's a name that is not remembered. His guilt and treason, so they said, had been so horrible that his name was never to be pronounced again. Moreover, that name was erased from the annals, the laws, the decrees, from history books, official registries, monuments, coins, escutcheons, maps, poems. Poems, because the emperor had written songs and poems ever since he was a boy. Unfortunately, he'd been a good poet...{a}nd to tell you the truth, many of his poems survived despite everything....To make art, even an art as debased by solipsism as I contend that poetry is, stands in glaring relief to the notion of a traitorous soul, says Author Gorodischer in the arch, snarky, yet eager to educate voice of the storyteller. Yes, that's the source from which this chapter flows to the restive bu receptive ears of the storyteller's audience:
Now even you people, with all the sensitivity of paving-stones, have figured out that {they}...had been drawn toward the young prince by more than mere chance. We may ask ourselves–ask yourselves, because I've done it already and come up with the answer–whether chance rules humankind or or if all our acts are foreseen...{a}nd it's no use asking this curious question of the wise, because some will insist that everything is chance, others will say it plays no part, and maybe all of them are right, since since they all suspect, behind chance or non-chance, the workings of a secret order.This narrative voice appeals to me a great deal, it soothes my snobbish downward-gazing know-it-all to read the kind of words I've only barely learned to keep shtumm.
Stop laughing. I have so learned. Imperfectly, perhaps, but learned.
The storyteller regales the only barely willing ears of his audience with the growth of the tenth emperor into an adult over the course of a few short weeks. He is seven years old, trapped in a Gormenghastly nightmare of meaningless ritual and loveless display instead of intimacy; the others, rough beasts slouching toward Bethlehem, teach his blossoming inner man about realities of life and existence, give him a new identity (the ferret of the title), and ultimately unlock the rage he has borne since he was born.
He no longer hated his nameless father, if ever he had hated him as they had told him he he should do, because he loved {his interlocutors}. Every misfortune has its lucky side, say the wise. And I'd add that every good thing has its disadvantages, and the disadvantage of love is precisely that it leaves room for nothing else....That is, as I assume my readers know, the simple and honest truth. Love simply is, and it is vaster than anything a mere human can conceptualize. Hard enough to express it, to encompass it , after learning what it is; words are so small, thoughts are so basic, the existence of a state/sensation/need like love can't be stuffed down into them, not even them all. We must try, though, or be strangled on their immensity. After all, as the storyteller tells us, "...the wise say that words, being daughters of the flesh, spoil if they're kept locked up.
Siege, Battle, and Victory of Selimmagud is distasteful, homophobic, and frankly indicative of qualities of mind that I saw in the relentless heterosexual binaries of Le Guin's famous The Left Hand of Darkness and the not-very-subtle homophobia of The Dispossessed (which so offended me that I actually erased it from my experience of the book until reminded of it in a recent guided re-read of the book). The uniformly victorious general of the Seventh Imperial Army of Assault is the "hermaphrodite" (or intersex, as we say these days) child of a lesbian Duchess and a gay Marshal. Because of course the Duchess of COLDWINTER would give birth to such a creature, as the General is portrayed as, in his slinky blond slenderness. Things go downhill from there. It taints my pleasure in this otherwise deeply pleasurable read.
Concerning the Unchecked Growth of Cities is as detailed, as lumbered with names as the begats in the Bible. Significantly more fun, however, and quite, in the end, a wry tale of life's innumerable Zen jokes. The storyteller tells us about the nature of History, Kleio not what's in old newspapers, the nature of the story of the past not the time gone by. So the storyteller sets us up in this universe, the History of the empire's multi-capital, as follows:
All these works of imaginative inventions unfortunately got into chronicles, which were made into books which everybody respected and believed, principally because they were thick, hard to hold, tedious, and old. And they got into legends, those tales that everybody says they don't believe in because they can't take them seriously, and that everybody believes in precisely because they can't take them seriously.Well, yes. Too much taking seriously of things that can't bear the weight of seriousness leads to deep fractures in the foundations of society. I'm struggling to come up with a real-world example of this. /sarcasm
The storyteller is a wonderful and arch presence throughout the story.
When an ancient, poverty-stricken woman called {the failed usurper} to come in and share her midday meal, he wouldn't sit at the table, but ate humbly crouching in the doorway. That was when he discovered that he liked this job, not as much as the job of emperor, maybe, but it was all he had. That same evening he preached for the first time.And thus, my ducks, the beginning of the end for stable secular society. Someone who understands politics gets the religious burr under their saddle and it's all over and no mistake.
But the ends of politics and religion, whether meshing or clashing, are as nothing compared to humankind's impulse to slaughter, destroy, wreck, wreak havoc upon, their fellow humans:
The Battle of the North lasted exactly fifty hours. The men attacked, broke, scattered, retreated, had a bite to eat, and returned to the attack. Telling such things one is sickened by what men are. They were not men; nor were they wolves, nor hyenas, nor vultures, nor eagles. They were blind organisms, mindless, nerveless, without feeling or thought, with only the power to wound, and blood to shed.I trust you note in the above passage the explicit and ongoing (quite a lengthy paragraph continues on from this excerpt; I don't want to type it) gendering of violence. Both Author Gorodischer and Translator Le Guin subscribe to masculine culpability tropes in social illness. I don't think that's the whole story, but the evidence of male violent behavior is pretty damned obvious to anyone with eyes. And these eyes, the women and the mother who wrote and translated the story, are unsparing.
I don't blame them a bit.
BOOK TWO: THE GREATEST EMPIRE
Portrait of the Empress tells a lovely, fantasy-fulfilling tale of Virtue Rewarded. The Storyteller, bless him, revels in knowing secrets and telling tales; protest though he might about the Role of the Taleteller in spreading the word of the best, the worst, the rest of us, he is a creature of the Power that controls access to the world's powerful.
Power, bah! {the Great Empress would} say, looking disillusioned. Only if you forget about power can you govern well, she'd say. And it was true. She forgot about the power she had, which was immense, and so power, ignored and disdained, courted her, trotted after her...But she despised it utterly and made it wait like a beggar at the palace gates. Anybody could approach her, anybody could come into the palace and talk to her, for not depending on power she had no fear, and dispensed with protocol and ceremony. She was the first person on the imperial throne for centuries and centuries who kept no bodyguards, the first to go down in the streets unprotected...carried in a sedan chair like any rich woman, or on foot like any workman's or tradesman's wife. So it was that I knew her.For yes, lads and lasses, the storyteller in his humbleness caught the august attention of the Great Empress! She, all uneducated, knew that she needed to know what a storyteller whose words wove magic from the lives of dead and gone people and places now crumbled to dust. Why on Earth, you ask (I did), should this be? How can someone attain an office people literally kill to occupy without knowing one blessèd thing about its history and the consequences of its misuses?! /sarcasm
In the Great Empress's case, by being canny, astute, flexible enough to speak truth to Power without belaboring the point being made. By being honest, within reason, by telling someone whose life differed from her own by the most astonishing and appalling degree the home truths that all of us need to know. By being, at all times and in all ways, clear-sighted and pragmatic.
I assume, then, you won't be surprised to know that the Great Empress was no believer in majgickq:
Magic can't be trusted, I assure you; what's useful is quickness and certainty in making up one's mind. And that's not magic even if it looks like it, because you can only do it when you've learned to think your own thoughts. In those few minutes I had realized that the Emperor was dying, that some of the people around him were fakes and the rest incompetents, and that here, at the throne, I could find a use for the energy I wasted...Once I knew that and knew I knew it and discussed it with myself and accepted it, when the emperor asked how I'd come by the {healing stone}, I told him the truth and added, truthfully, that he and I alone knew it.That is the shortest road to power for the powerless: Never toady, never lie, never make more of something than it can bear. It was in telling the dying emperor these truths that the Great Empress put her feet onto the path to her world's highest and most august office, one she has occupied and executed with admirable restraint and honor.
Author Gorodischer posits a solution to the empire's ills that very much annoys me, one that I first encountered when I read Richard Sennett's urbanization-without-policing magnum opus The Uses of Disorder. Fifty years ago, he wrote this paean to the notion of urban libertarianism. The author here espouses a semi-urban libertarianism that makes me just as sick to my stomach. Gay people will most likely know why: The idea of a community setting its standards for itself, and enforcing them inside itself, is a recipe for persecution of the Other, the queer and different-colored and just different. Womyn-only spaces are safe! Unless you're some womon's tweenaged son. Black-only communities are safe! Unless you're trans. etc etc etc ad nauseam ad infinitum
There will never, utopian anarchists, be a day when it isn't someone's turn in the barrel.
And the Streets Empty is also unpleasant, containing revenge porn for women who are abused by men. Ableist, denigrates sex workers as so many of these stories do.
The Pool tells us of the many ways we lie to ourselves, for the best and worst of reasons, and become trapped in the illusions we create to hide our lies and their consequences from ruining our happiness. A doctor who practices his healing arts on Whiterose Street fails to accept the lies of the world, and so effects healing on his patients:
"We keep adding needless things, false things to ourselves, till we can't see ourselves and forget what our true shape is. And if we've forgotten what shape we are, how can we find the right place to be? And who dares pull away the falsities that are stuck to his eyelids, his fingernails, his heels? So then something goes wrong in the house and in the world, and we get sick. ... What's dangerous isn't having them, said the doctor, what's serious is loving them."After great storms and mighty political upheavals and misguided attempts to be excluded from the universal laws of sadness and regret, the doctor's healing of a bad man, a man who has done bad things, a man whose criminal acts offend the idea of self he carries within himself, leads to this doctor's acquisition of an apprentice who wants to know the names of far-away flowers he cannot see. Other changes, less important ones, take place offstage...and the history books get rewritten again because of them.
Perfect.
Basic Weapons in which the storyteller tells us of a man, one without legs but with a serviceable set of wheels, who conceives of an envious passion: He wishes to wheedle his way into a rich man's home. He does this by committing, repeatedly, the worst sin a being can commit: To use the existence of another for one's own profit.
Then the boy did what the salesman had described: he danced. He moved first without changing place, both feet as if fixed to the ground. He waved his arms, lifted them held them out; he swayed, and he made circles with his body, twisting his waist, and with his head, that seemed to turn feel\y at the end of his long neck. Then he leapt, without ceasing to sawy the rest of his body. He spun on one foot, on the other, bowed down, swept the ground with his hands, straightened up, ran two steps to one side, three to the other, his arms held high, his head fallen back. ... And the dealer (in curiosities like the dancer)? He had felt the world begin to spin quicker than it had ever done, more dizzily than when it was an incandescent lump of rock under the attentive eye of God.The salesman made his sale; the dealer had a deal that leads him into the halls of the most powerful, wealthiest old man in the district. The old man is, as who would not be in a world that has never known dance, by the blond boy he must rent by the performance from the dealer. And, as is the way of nature, the storyteller reminds us that there is no fool like an old, dying fool.
Unless it's a hate-addicted legless bastard with a beautiful slave.
"Down There in the South" they say, "Not all is said; it hasn't all been said." And they are right, it hasn't and, I suspect, it can't all be said or there would be no more empire or villages or lakes bleeding rivers.
Yes, and it's always been that way, always. There've been emperors who dreamed of subjugating the South. There've been emperors who tried it, and some thought they'd done it. But with what? I ask, with what? With power, weapons, armies, fire, terror? Useless, all that, completely useless: all power can do is silence people, keep them from singing, arguing, dancing, talking, brawling, making speeches, and composing music. That's all. That's a lot, you may say, but I tell you it's not enough. For what power can keep the earth from speaking to people? What weapons can keep water from running and stones from rolling? What artillery can keep a storm from crouching on the horizon, ready to burst?A bad man, venal and corrupt and from the nobility, does a bad thing and runs away. So far, so "uh huh and your point is..." It is necessary for his fat, lazy, criminal self to move fast, think faster, and hide. None of these come exactly naturally from being a pampered noble cheat. But dig we must when a spade is beside us and a gun behind. Our vile man runs, perish forbid for a scion of the empire to do, but runs of necessity to the South.
He soon noticed that in the South the air was not that inert space he had known in parks, the suffocating perfumed mantle of bedrooms, the weary, stale atmosphere of casinos. The air he breathed here was as thick and fertile as the earth and water. The earth sustained everything and under it was the water; but the water rose up too and covered the earth, and the air that was above them both extended down into the earth enriched by the water, silent or noisy, and a white-gold dust floated and drifted around still things and among the insects with transparent wings and the greedy birds darting among fleshy leaves. And this joyous commotion went on all the time, everywhere, and he had to take part in it.This is a place that will, that must, change a man walking through it into a being joining with it; or else he will die. (I'm in the die camp. I hate heat.) On his way through the South, he learns that men are dancers and women singers in this world, and that there exist thirty-seven dances. This, to his Northern self, is just flat freaky.
But there he goes, our not-the-worst-of-men, murdering cheating nobleman slowly with each step abrading away the false and brummagem from himself. He meets people, he learns their ways of doing and being in the world; he attacks no one, cheats nothing, arrives and leaves because coming necessitates going. He returns because parting means reunion. He is, simply put, never ever still but always being his way into becoming.
And what does our storyteller have to tell us about people who be their way into becoming? Why, that they become what they truly are and experience their life from the place they've readied themselves to occupy.
"They have fled," {the general} repeated. "In terror," he added with a complacent smile.I hope he enjoyed it.
The emperor smiled too. I believe it was the last smile of his life.
The Old Incense Road added little to the gestalt. The Cat, a brat, does bratty stuff while an old man, Z'Someone, growls and grumbles and everyone does a few different things and honestly, I have no idea how this one is different from any fantasy story in the world except it lacks the storyteller's arch, dry wit. Not the story I'd've gone out on; calling this a novel doesn't make it one and this would be a crap ending to a novel anyway, and as a collection, that wasn't a good outro.
Because this book is ***PERFECT*** for book clubs, there exists a handy-dandy reader's guide to spark discussions that should, most likely will, lead to much vigorous side-taking. Bracing, exciting discussions ahead!
Monday, August 24, 2020
SUITE FOR BARBARA LODEN, a hybrid literary biography/novel that miraculously transports us
SUITE FOR BARBARA LODEN
NATHALIE LÉGER (tr. Nathalie Lehrer and Cécile Menon)
Dorothy, a publishing project
$16.00 trade paperback, available now
Rating: 5* of five
The Publisher Says: “I believe there is a miracle in Wanda,” wrote Marguerite Duras of the only film American actress Barbara Loden ever wrote and directed. “Usually, there is a distance between representation and text, subject and action. Here that distance is completely eradicated.” It is perhaps this “miracle”—the seeming collapse of fiction and fact—that has made Wanda (1970) a cult classic, and a fascination of artists from Isabelle Huppert to Rachel Kushner to Kate Zambreno. For acclaimed French writer Nathalie Léger, the mysteries of Wanda launched an obsessive quest across continents, into archives, and through mining towns of Pennsylvania, all to get closer to the film and its maker. Suite for Barbara Loden is the magnificent result.
Moving contrapuntally between biography and autofiction, film criticism and anecdote, fact and speculation, Suite for Barbara Loden is a stunning meditation on knowledge and self-knowledge, on the surfaces of life and art, and how we come to truth—a kind of truth—not through facts alone but through acts of the imagination.
My Review: As Duras says above, “I believe there is a miracle in Wanda,” writing of the only film American actress Barbara Loden ever created. “Usually, there is a distance between representation and text, subject and action. Here that distance is completely eradicated.”
A film more famous in our time than in the year it was released, Barbara Loden’s sole filmed work as writer and director went from an affront to American feminists—how dare a woman filmmaker represent a woman as a passive pawn in her own life!—to a smash reception at the 31st Venice International Film Festival, where it received Best Foreign Film honors—as the only American entrant accepted that year. Honestly, it might as well have been a foreign film right here in the USA for all the attention it received in the 1970s.
Loden was an actress who was famous if you knew who she was. She was the leggy, semi-clothed blonde bombshell sidekick to sophisticated sketch and improvisational comedian Ernie Kovacs on his critical darling of a revue show. She won a Tony Award in 1964 for playing a thinly disguised take on Marilyn Monroe in an Arthur Miller play. She was a featured actress in several of second husband Elia Kazan’s films (eg, Splendor in the Grass). Her Method acting was learned at the Actors’ Studio while she was a teen-aged dancer at the famed Copacabana nightclub. This was a woman of formidable ability and negligible self-confidence who, paradoxically, married two high-powered men (her first husband was film and television project distributor Larry Joachim, a major player in the early years of television) and left each of them yearning for the strength to control her.
French author Nathalie Léger is introduced to this subject of obsessive interest by a writing assignment: Create a composite entry for Loden and her single outing as a writer/director for inclusion in a film encyclopedia. Léger tells us that she got the instruction from said editor, “No need to put your heart and soul into it.” Sounds to me as though this was not the editor’s first go-round with Mme Léger. That was possibly the most wasted breath the editor had ever used to form speech. “I was trying to be as objective and rigorous as possible. To describe and only to describe, in as few words as possible,” says Léger of beginning her research. Instead, this encyclopedia entry blossoms into a combination personal essay, critical assessment of film, director, and star, and miniature biography of a minor player in the film world with a major talent.
At the very most, I’d expect someone charged with writing an encyclopedia entry to visit a film-school library, see if the subject’s only film was available in some format and give it a watch, at the extravagant end spend the money for an international phone call to an easy-to-locate colleague of Loden’s who was still living at the time. Léger flies to Pennsylvania’s coal country, the setting of the film; contacts film scholars in the USA as well as famous French star of the same era as Loden, Isabelle Huppert; haunts the late Loden’s son, who possesses “twenty-five boxes” of material on his mother and (not unreasonably to me) wants to know what specifically or even generally Léger is looking for; and can’t articulate to any of them precisely what it is she is seeking. I have the sense that, even as this beautiful and intimate mixed portrait of Loden, Wanda, and Léger was going to press, she wouldn’t have been able to articulate precisely what the purpose of her journey was except in terms of its result.
Loden and Léger are each on a road trip towards some sort of epiphany. Loden’s, as Wanda, is going to be fraught with the usual sort of misery and pointless, purposeless suffering that is the lot of the intellectually ungifted when they come unmoored from whatever habits and relationships they’ve tangled themselves into. Léger’s road trip is guided by that savior of the directionless, GPS:
It is a very good film, if you’d care to watch its 102 minutes. Cinema vérité isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, and while the ample-for-its-day budget of $110,000 is spent so that it shows on camera the seedy underbelly of the American Dream is pretty much intact and uncomfortably familiar. The upholstery is different colors and the TVs have flat screens. All of Wanda’s acting is done by Loden and her man, Michael Higgins; as Mr. Dennis, he’s the latest loser to tow her long behind him. He’s enough of an improvement over the husband she didn’t so much leave as simply drop and forget to pick up that Wanda makes every attempt to stay with him as his petty little control tactics become more and more desperate (throwing a new pair of slacks out the car window because “no slacks when you’re with me,” and “no curlers, they make you look cheap; do you wanna look cheap?”) as his unrevealed criminal plan begins to crack open. But for Wanda this is the big time, this is freedom from the hideous coal-mining burgs of her entire life, from kids she doesn’t care about, from people who know her and despise her. Author Léger relates this barren freedom to her own mother’s life, and does so in a way that makes clear what those 1970s American feminists were testy about: At every turn, these women exist, actually exist, only in relation to the plans and persons of their men.
The bleak truth is that many women in 2016 are in the same boat. Wanda’s cult classic status among the most sophisticated cinephiles does not make the subject matter more comfortable for today’s energetic and ever-more-successful activists to watch. And Léger, by writing a beautiful film critique mixed with a biographical sketch and a patch or two of memoir, has used artful image juxtapositions to create the unsettling but unignorable truth behind all of these stories.
NATHALIE LÉGER (tr. Nathalie Lehrer and Cécile Menon)
Dorothy, a publishing project
$16.00 trade paperback, available now
Rating: 5* of five
The Publisher Says: “I believe there is a miracle in Wanda,” wrote Marguerite Duras of the only film American actress Barbara Loden ever wrote and directed. “Usually, there is a distance between representation and text, subject and action. Here that distance is completely eradicated.” It is perhaps this “miracle”—the seeming collapse of fiction and fact—that has made Wanda (1970) a cult classic, and a fascination of artists from Isabelle Huppert to Rachel Kushner to Kate Zambreno. For acclaimed French writer Nathalie Léger, the mysteries of Wanda launched an obsessive quest across continents, into archives, and through mining towns of Pennsylvania, all to get closer to the film and its maker. Suite for Barbara Loden is the magnificent result.
Moving contrapuntally between biography and autofiction, film criticism and anecdote, fact and speculation, Suite for Barbara Loden is a stunning meditation on knowledge and self-knowledge, on the surfaces of life and art, and how we come to truth—a kind of truth—not through facts alone but through acts of the imagination.
My Review: As Duras says above, “I believe there is a miracle in Wanda,” writing of the only film American actress Barbara Loden ever created. “Usually, there is a distance between representation and text, subject and action. Here that distance is completely eradicated.”
A film more famous in our time than in the year it was released, Barbara Loden’s sole filmed work as writer and director went from an affront to American feminists—how dare a woman filmmaker represent a woman as a passive pawn in her own life!—to a smash reception at the 31st Venice International Film Festival, where it received Best Foreign Film honors—as the only American entrant accepted that year. Honestly, it might as well have been a foreign film right here in the USA for all the attention it received in the 1970s.
Loden was an actress who was famous if you knew who she was. She was the leggy, semi-clothed blonde bombshell sidekick to sophisticated sketch and improvisational comedian Ernie Kovacs on his critical darling of a revue show. She won a Tony Award in 1964 for playing a thinly disguised take on Marilyn Monroe in an Arthur Miller play. She was a featured actress in several of second husband Elia Kazan’s films (eg, Splendor in the Grass). Her Method acting was learned at the Actors’ Studio while she was a teen-aged dancer at the famed Copacabana nightclub. This was a woman of formidable ability and negligible self-confidence who, paradoxically, married two high-powered men (her first husband was film and television project distributor Larry Joachim, a major player in the early years of television) and left each of them yearning for the strength to control her.
French author Nathalie Léger is introduced to this subject of obsessive interest by a writing assignment: Create a composite entry for Loden and her single outing as a writer/director for inclusion in a film encyclopedia. Léger tells us that she got the instruction from said editor, “No need to put your heart and soul into it.” Sounds to me as though this was not the editor’s first go-round with Mme Léger. That was possibly the most wasted breath the editor had ever used to form speech. “I was trying to be as objective and rigorous as possible. To describe and only to describe, in as few words as possible,” says Léger of beginning her research. Instead, this encyclopedia entry blossoms into a combination personal essay, critical assessment of film, director, and star, and miniature biography of a minor player in the film world with a major talent.
At the very most, I’d expect someone charged with writing an encyclopedia entry to visit a film-school library, see if the subject’s only film was available in some format and give it a watch, at the extravagant end spend the money for an international phone call to an easy-to-locate colleague of Loden’s who was still living at the time. Léger flies to Pennsylvania’s coal country, the setting of the film; contacts film scholars in the USA as well as famous French star of the same era as Loden, Isabelle Huppert; haunts the late Loden’s son, who possesses “twenty-five boxes” of material on his mother and (not unreasonably to me) wants to know what specifically or even generally Léger is looking for; and can’t articulate to any of them precisely what it is she is seeking. I have the sense that, even as this beautiful and intimate mixed portrait of Loden, Wanda, and Léger was going to press, she wouldn’t have been able to articulate precisely what the purpose of her journey was except in terms of its result.
Loden and Léger are each on a road trip towards some sort of epiphany. Loden’s, as Wanda, is going to be fraught with the usual sort of misery and pointless, purposeless suffering that is the lot of the intellectually ungifted when they come unmoored from whatever habits and relationships they’ve tangled themselves into. Léger’s road trip is guided by that savior of the directionless, GPS:
Sky. The ocean floor. The earth’s gravity field. Lines, measurements, a shape, a time. What the experts call the figure of the earth. I don’t want to know any more. I allow myself to be guided; I don’t understand the organized collusion of data transformed into electromagnetic waves that come crashing mathematically into the rental car’s black box to dictate my itinerary. I’ve muted the sound; heading into this unknown country I rely only on the image of the infinite ribbon unspooling on the GPS screen. No obstacles, a marvelous, illusory continuity, the perfect representation of stupidity—what others might call an acceptable representation of reality. “The magic box,” the mechanic had said. I have heard that the GPS is altering our perception of our position in space and the way we travel from place to place. The very notion of an itinerary is problematic nowadays; some people go so far as to believe that everything, including time and emotions, can be localized. It seems to be becoming increasingly difficult to accept that we don’t always know exactly where we are, and by extension it is becoming increasingly difficult to know exactly where we are.Where in the world is Léger? She’s lost; or she’s not found, anyway, not by the spirit she seeks so assiduously that, instead of knocking out two hundred fifty words or so on a minor player in the film world, she knocks on time’s doors and bangs her shins on the invisible furniture in the dark theaters where Wanda isn’t playing.
It is a very good film, if you’d care to watch its 102 minutes. Cinema vérité isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, and while the ample-for-its-day budget of $110,000 is spent so that it shows on camera the seedy underbelly of the American Dream is pretty much intact and uncomfortably familiar. The upholstery is different colors and the TVs have flat screens. All of Wanda’s acting is done by Loden and her man, Michael Higgins; as Mr. Dennis, he’s the latest loser to tow her long behind him. He’s enough of an improvement over the husband she didn’t so much leave as simply drop and forget to pick up that Wanda makes every attempt to stay with him as his petty little control tactics become more and more desperate (throwing a new pair of slacks out the car window because “no slacks when you’re with me,” and “no curlers, they make you look cheap; do you wanna look cheap?”) as his unrevealed criminal plan begins to crack open. But for Wanda this is the big time, this is freedom from the hideous coal-mining burgs of her entire life, from kids she doesn’t care about, from people who know her and despise her. Author Léger relates this barren freedom to her own mother’s life, and does so in a way that makes clear what those 1970s American feminists were testy about: At every turn, these women exist, actually exist, only in relation to the plans and persons of their men.
The bleak truth is that many women in 2016 are in the same boat. Wanda’s cult classic status among the most sophisticated cinephiles does not make the subject matter more comfortable for today’s energetic and ever-more-successful activists to watch. And Léger, by writing a beautiful film critique mixed with a biographical sketch and a patch or two of memoir, has used artful image juxtapositions to create the unsettling but unignorable truth behind all of these stories.
Sunday, August 23, 2020
FOUR PERFECT PEBBLES, a timely (when isn't it timely?) reminder of the horrors of populism
FOUR PERFECT PEBBLES
LILA PERL (tr. Marion Blumenthal Lazan)
Greenwillow Books
$16.99 hardcover edition, $6.99 paperback edition, $1.99 ebook, available now
Rating: 4* of five
The Publisher Says: Marion Blumenthal Lazan’s unforgettable and acclaimed memoir recalls the devastating years that shaped her childhood. Following Hitler’s rise to power, the Blumenthal family—father, mother, Marion, and her brother, Albert—were trapped in Nazi Germany. They managed eventually to get to Holland, but soon thereafter it was occupied by the Nazis. For the next six and a half years the Blumenthals were forced to live in refugee, transit, and prison camps, including Westerbork in Holland and Bergen-Belsen in Germany, before finally making it to the United States. Their story is one of horror and hardship, but it is also a story of courage, hope, and the will to survive.
Four Perfect Pebbles features forty archival photographs, including several new to this edition, an epilogue, a bibliography, a map, a reading group guide, an index, and a new afterword by the author. First published in 1996, the book was an ALA Notable Book, an ALA Quick Pick for Reluctant Readers, and IRA Young Adults’ Choice, and a Notable Trade Book in the Field of Social Studies, and the recipient of many other honors.
My Review: In the annals of man's cruelty to man, the Holocaust stands out for its sheer, industrial-scale coldness and horror. There is ample literature attesting to the awfulness of being condemned to death for the mere accident of being born to a Jewish parent. This book, another entry into that crowded segment, is aimed at young readers.
I don't know that any book about the Holocaust is something I want young readers to read. It's too huge and too vile a topic to make me feel comfortable introducing it to those whose lives are still in the vulnerable and bendable stage. I wouldn't let my child read this book, far better she should read the Marquis de Sade than this kind of material.
But the world disagrees with me. So I am renewedly glad that I have no young children. But I think this story is one that makes the idea of the Holocaust, its especial and unique evil in human history, more painfully poignantly real than any other literary work I've ever seen: This is the story of a child who went through the system with her family intact, until the bitter horrifying end of the tale. This is what the horrible, vile, evil, disgusting Germans wanted to destroy: A little girl, her mama, her papa, and her big brother.
Because they were Jews.
Now look at the humanitarian crises of economic and war refugees being towed out to see and left by the Greek Government; the tide of Islamophobia wracking European countries; the perennial racism and populism of the US against Hispanic and native-born Black people; the Othering of every Asian minority because of a disease that was first detected in China; and tell me that this book is no longer relevant. Has nothing to say to you, your concerns, is old-fashioned.
It isn't.
LILA PERL (tr. Marion Blumenthal Lazan)
Greenwillow Books
$16.99 hardcover edition, $6.99 paperback edition, $1.99 ebook, available now
Rating: 4* of five
The Publisher Says: Marion Blumenthal Lazan’s unforgettable and acclaimed memoir recalls the devastating years that shaped her childhood. Following Hitler’s rise to power, the Blumenthal family—father, mother, Marion, and her brother, Albert—were trapped in Nazi Germany. They managed eventually to get to Holland, but soon thereafter it was occupied by the Nazis. For the next six and a half years the Blumenthals were forced to live in refugee, transit, and prison camps, including Westerbork in Holland and Bergen-Belsen in Germany, before finally making it to the United States. Their story is one of horror and hardship, but it is also a story of courage, hope, and the will to survive.
Four Perfect Pebbles features forty archival photographs, including several new to this edition, an epilogue, a bibliography, a map, a reading group guide, an index, and a new afterword by the author. First published in 1996, the book was an ALA Notable Book, an ALA Quick Pick for Reluctant Readers, and IRA Young Adults’ Choice, and a Notable Trade Book in the Field of Social Studies, and the recipient of many other honors.
My Review: In the annals of man's cruelty to man, the Holocaust stands out for its sheer, industrial-scale coldness and horror. There is ample literature attesting to the awfulness of being condemned to death for the mere accident of being born to a Jewish parent. This book, another entry into that crowded segment, is aimed at young readers.
I don't know that any book about the Holocaust is something I want young readers to read. It's too huge and too vile a topic to make me feel comfortable introducing it to those whose lives are still in the vulnerable and bendable stage. I wouldn't let my child read this book, far better she should read the Marquis de Sade than this kind of material.
But the world disagrees with me. So I am renewedly glad that I have no young children. But I think this story is one that makes the idea of the Holocaust, its especial and unique evil in human history, more painfully poignantly real than any other literary work I've ever seen: This is the story of a child who went through the system with her family intact, until the bitter horrifying end of the tale. This is what the horrible, vile, evil, disgusting Germans wanted to destroy: A little girl, her mama, her papa, and her big brother.
Because they were Jews.
Now look at the humanitarian crises of economic and war refugees being towed out to see and left by the Greek Government; the tide of Islamophobia wracking European countries; the perennial racism and populism of the US against Hispanic and native-born Black people; the Othering of every Asian minority because of a disease that was first detected in China; and tell me that this book is no longer relevant. Has nothing to say to you, your concerns, is old-fashioned.
It isn't.
Wednesday, August 19, 2020
THE SUMMER BOOK, Tove Jansson's novel of a child being fully present in a world about to change
THE SUMMER BOOK
TOVE JANSSON (tr. Thomas Teal)
NYRB Classics
$14.95 trade paper, available now
Rating: 4.5* of five
The Independent Press Top 40 Bestsellers: Fiction For the week ending August 4, 2026
The Publisher Says: In The Summer Book Tove Jansson distills the essence of the summer—its sunlight and storms—into twenty-two crystalline vignettes. This brief novel tells the story of Sophia, a six-year-old girl awakening to existence, and Sophia’s grandmother, nearing the end of hers, as they spend the summer on a tiny unspoiled island in the Gulf of Finland. The grandmother is unsentimental and wise, if a little cranky; Sophia is impetuous and volatile, but she tends to her grandmother with the care of a new parent. Together they amble over coastline and forest in easy companionship, build boats from bark, create a miniature Venice, write a fanciful study of local bugs. They discuss things that matter to young and old alike: life, death, the nature of God and of love. “On an island,” thinks the grandmother, “everything is complete.” In The Summer Book, Jansson creates her own complete world, full of the varied joys and sorrows of life.
Tove Jansson, whose Moomintroll comic strip and books brought her international acclaim, lived for much of her life on an island like the one described in The Summer Book, and the work can be enjoyed as her closely observed journal of the sounds, sights, and feel of a summer spent in intimate contact with the natural world.
The Summer Book is translated from the Swedish by Thomas Teal.
My Review: I am a person who likes quiet. My home environment, when I'm able to force my will on my roommate, is free of audio pollution like TV and radio. Perhaps in compensation, I love spy stories and space-war epics and historical novels with battles, explosions, near misses with the main character dangling from rooftops...the very essence of un-quiet.
It was a particularly good evening to begin a book.This is an attitude and a pleasure I cannot share within my present living arrangement, to my sorrow; so I read about it instead, I take myself there with Author Jansson (Moomintroll fame, I'm *sure* you already know).
The Summer Book is, in contrast, the quietest reading imaginable. Yes, there are storms...an island will experience a lot of those...there are misfit neighbors in ugly houses, and all of it is so much the proper order of things that they fail to create fear in the reader. The two or three hours you'll spend with this family as its members learn to grow, learn to let go, and simply earn their living won't be wasted.
'It's funny about love', Sophia said. 'The more you love someone, the less he likes you back.'
'That's very true,' Grandmother observed. 'And so what do you do?'
'You go on loving,' said Sophia threateningly. 'You love harder and harder.'
I'd strongly suggest this as a midafternoon sunny-day read, or the quiet and the rightness of story and style will lull the tense, stressed, relaxation-deprived modern person into a deep, satisfying sleep.
It is still summer, but the summer is no longer alive. It has come to a standstill; nothing withers, and fall is not ready to begin. There are no stars yet, just darkness.Peace portrayed with elegant ease.
Wednesday, August 5, 2020
A FINE LINE, fifth Guido Guerrieri procedural set in Bari, Italy
A FINE LINE
GIANRICO CAROFIGLIO (Guido Gerrieri #5) {tr. Howard Curtis}
Bitter Lemon Press
$9.99 Kindle edition, available now
Rating: 4.25* of five
The Publisher Says: The fifth in the best-selling Guido Guerrieri series.
When Judge Larocca is accused of corruption, Guerrieri goes against his better instincts and takes the case. Helped by Annapaola Doria, a motorbike-riding bisexual private detective who keeps a baseball bat on hand for sticky situations, he discovers that the judge has links to the mafia. Larocca is blind to the immorality of his actions but Annapaola makes sure that justice is done, perhaps not in the most orthodox way. Of course Guerrieri cannot stop himself from falling for Annapaola's exotic charms.
The novel is a suspenseful legal thriller but it is also much more. It is the story of a judge who, to quote Dostoevsky, "lies to himself and listens to his own lies, so gets to the point where he can no longer distinguish the truth, either in himself or around himself."
Book One review — Book Two review — Book Three review — Book Four review
THIS BOOK WAS BORROWED VIA INTERLIBRARY LOAN. SUPPORT YOUR LIBRARY!
My Review: As you know by now, this is not the usual legal thriller. I found it just lovely to read, and for someone who's closer to 70 than to 40 I think that will hold true; but I'm sorry to say I do not think it will be of very wide appeal. The author's Italian-Mafia-prosecutor background has given us lots of good moments in the Italian legal system. Believe me, US citizens, it needs the kind of explication that will bore Grisham readers stupid.
Even I wanted things to get moving already, in fact several times flipped ahead two pages to get away from verbosity. So not my highest recommendation...but the pleasures of reading the book are there for the patient and the curious. Whatever you do, do NOT start here! Start at the beginning with Involuntary Witness and get to know Guido. He ages more or less in real time, unlike many (if not most) US series-mystery leads. This makes the Guido of this novel significantly more seasoned, and less approachable if you will, than his earlier self. Don't waver because of that...he's not surly! He's simply...feeling Time's Arrow nudging between his shoulder-blades.
But the pleasures of reading these stories are quite clear, very evident, eg:
Jurists, with rare exceptions, are unconsciously and tenaciously averse to clarity and brevity.It is worth remembering what the author's career is...trial lawyer...when reading that quote. He's got the insider dope, alrighty all right, and is sharing it with us. In more ways than one, and some are unconscious and unintentional....
This quote should be engraved on the rocks we throw at 45 after he's impeached, convicted, and is being transported to his forever home in prison:
Power – any form of power – is acceptable only if it’s transparent and clean, if it’s exercised in a way that is equal for everybody.Don't guess that needs belaboring.
Occasionally Author Carofiglio lapses into some sort of brain seizure, a strange and sad misalignment of synapses that produces these odd statements of unnecessary-to-refute error:
The situation had got out of hand, particularly because of the books. Apart from those on the shelves, there were books everywhere. On the floor, on the tables, on the sofas, in the bathroom, in the kitchen—and let's be honest, not all of them were indispensable.Poor man. So sad, those delusions of...of...well, beats me what you call it, but it's the syndrome when some Satanic imp uses your brain to bring *shudder* book-desacralization disorder into the world. Imagine thinking some books are dispensible! It is to laugh!
TEMPORARY PERFECTIONS, fourth Guido Guerrieri procedural set in Bari, Italy
TEMPORARY PERFECTIONS
GIANRICO CAROFIGLIO (Guido Guerrieri #4) {tr. Anthony Shugaar}
Rizzoli USA
$11.99 Kindle edition, available now
Rating: 4.5* of five
The Publisher Says: The electrifying best-selling crime thriller from Italy, available for the first time in English. An instant sensation and number-one best seller since its publication, Temporary Perfections is the fourth crime novel by former Italian prosecutor Gianrico Carofiglio to feature Guido Guerrieri. A lawyer practicing in Bari, in southwest Italy, Guido Guerrieri is hired by an old colleague to work a missing-persons case that the police have failed to solve. Manuela Ferraro disappeared six months ago after spending a September weekend at a beach resort; as Guerrieri digs deep into her life and activities, he stumbles into a sinister drug ring and the real truth about why Ferraro vanished.
Simultaneously thoughtful and suspenseful, this is crime fiction at its best.
Book One review — Book Two review — Book Three review — Book Five review
THIS BOOK WAS BORROWED VIA INTERLIBRARY LOAN. SUPPORT YOUR LIBRARY!
My Review: Fourth in the Guido Guerrieri series of Italian legal thrillers, this entry is not a procedural but a traditional private eye investigation. It is a true noir, set in Bari...a weirdly San Franciscan venue, and my how well its noirness is invoked.
Counselor Guerrieri, as the new translator calls him, is mid-flow on one of his usual if not terribly interesting workdays. He's had to move his law practice into new, American-ish offices because his former secretary has passed the bar and is now of counsel, and the adopted Peruvian daughter of some old friends is in there with him too. Plus a new secretary inherited from a deceased colleague. What was once snug became claustrophobic. So now Guido looks around himself, hating the slickness and the newness, and feeling all at sixes and sevens with his solitary life.
In walks an old colleague, with the zombified parents of a six-months-missing daughter. The Carabinieri, sort of a cross between the sheriffs and the FBI, must have missed something, Guido; you find people, you solve cases, Guido; please, my clients will pay you just to look over the file, Guido, please help them, look at them, they can't function, help them!
What co-dependent with a savior complex could resist such a plea? Not our Guido! No matter that he's a lawyer, not a PI, and no matter that the cop min charge of the case when it was opened is a friend of his, a man he respects, whose investigatory talents he trusts. Someone Needs Guido! And we're off, talking to the friends of vanished Manuela already interviewed, chasing down leads that have grown cold, being seduced and boinked by gorgeous, curvaceous young suspects...all the noir PI tropes are here, and well deployed.
In the end, Counselor Guerrieri solves the tawdry case, as everyone knows he will, but the fact that a Sherlock Holmes short story is the trigger that presents the solution to him is a touch I treasure. That the crime is solved and the guilty punished is a reason to read any fictional mystery, since real life seldom offers such order and satisfaction.
But then there are the dissatisfactions of this outing in the series. It is not a legal procedural thriller. There is no doubt in the mind of anyone at all that the vanished girl is dead from the get-go, so the suspense is only moderate. I am no fan of the sudden sea change in the direction, for all that I like noirs. I want my legal procedural fix!
And then there's the weirdness of the book being published by Rizzoli. ..!!.. That's right, the pretty-pictures people! It's a nice job, and it's not like they printed the book on 100-pound glossy paper and used overly ornamental dingbats on every page, but it's...unsettling...sort of like finding gay porn in your mama's nightstand. Error 404: File Not Found.
So why give it 4.5 stars, if I hate it? I don't hate it, it's quite well written, if translated in a way I'm less happy with that the previous two-book translator Howard Curtis did the job. But the main reason I've rated the book so highly is the portrayal of the bereaved parents.
Recommended.
Tuesday, August 4, 2020
INVOLUNTARY WITNESS, first Guido Guerrieri procedural set in Bari, Italy
INVOLUNTARY WITNESS
GIANRICO CAROFIGLIO (Guido Guerrieri #1) {tr. Patrick Creagh}
Bitter Lemon Press
$13.95, available now
Rating: 4.9* of five
The Publisher Says: The first in the Guido Guerrieri series.
A nine-year-old boy is found murdered at the bottom of a well near a popular beach resort in southern Italy. In what looks like a hopeless case for Guido Guerrieri, counsel for the defense, a Senegalese peddler is accused of the crime. Faced with small-town racism fuelled by the recent immigration from Africa, Guido attempts to exploit the esoteric workings of the Italian courts.
More than a perfectly paced legal thriller, this relentless suspense novel transcends the genre. A powerful attack on racism and a fascinating insight into the Italian judicial process, it is also an affectionate portrait of a deeply humane hero.
"Carofiglio writes crisp, ironical novels that are as much love stories and philosophical treatises as they are legal thrillers."—The New Yorker
"Raises the standard for crime fiction. Carofiglio's deft touch has given us a story that is both literary and gritty—and one that speeds along like the best legal thrillers. His insights into human nature—good and bad—are breathtaking." —Jeffery Deaver
Book Two review — Book Three review — Book Four review — Book Five review
THIS BOOK WAS BORROWED VIA INTERLIBRARY LOAN. SUPPORT YOUR LIBRARY!
My Review: Avvocato Guido Guerrieri, lawyer of Bari on Italy's southeastern coast, is fast approaching forty, newly separated from his wife of ten lost, bored years, and in the grips of the worst constellation of anxiety symptoms since Mr. Monk on the TV. He's moved into an apartment that he couldn't describe if you held a gun to his head, and he's absolutely unable to muster even a fake interest in his clients' problems. He sits, smiles, nods, files paperwork by rote, and in short lives on autopilot.
And then in walks a woman with a case. No money, but a case.
Non-European citizen Abajaje, Egyptian by birth, wants Guido to defend her...her...co-continental? boyfriend? fellow sufferer from race bias?...Abdou, a Senegalese immigrant and fake handbag selling beach vendor, against charges that he, a multilingual schoolteacher in Africa, with a love for children, did willfully restrain and cause harm to a child. The police are sure he did it; the few witnesses are sure it was him they saw acting strangely and cruising around the beach at the relevant time; what's the big deal here, anyway, he's just a black dude who talked to the kid, must be him who killed little Ciccio.
Except he was in Naples at the time. Guerrieri, in spite of himself, is intrigued by what the case doesn't have, proof, and what it does have, the defendant's improbable, unprovable, but true, alibi. Is truth capable of beating out prejudice in an Italian justice system not known for its love of Veracity, but more for her sister Verisimilitude?
Hmmm.
For 137pp, Carofiglio sets the stage with Guerrieri's craziness, his lackadaisical work habits, his depressed past and anxious present. It's all very nicely written, eg:
"You are intelligent, Avvocato. I have always thought of myself as more intelligent than other people. This is not a lucky thing, but it is hard to understand that.If you think yourself more intelligent than others, you fail to understand a lot of things, until they are suddenly brought home to you. And then it's too late."Thus Abdou the Non-European citizen to his lawyer in the prison's meeting room. I was regularly able to pause and appreciate the euphony and the accuracy of Carofiglio's writing. It shines through the book that he was a judge, in fact one of the judges who very bravely brought in guilty verdicts against Mafia defendants in the 90s trials that revolutionized the Mezzogiorno (Italy's southern region)'s social structure.
So it's no surprise to anyone that, in the last ~130pp, Carofiglio delivers the best, most complete, court trial I've read between book covers. It's a gem. It's pitch-perfect, and it's so nicely built that I hate to reveal it in detail. It's different than the standard American courtroom drama, because it's about the words, not the deeds, of the players. It's like listening to a fine old radio drama after watching an episode of "Starsky and Hutch" on AntennaTV.
It's a pleasure. I'm delighted to have found Sig. Carofiglio and Avv. Guerrieri at last.
Thursday, April 2, 2020
And now about these reviews....
In an older piece from The Atlantic, Maria Popova meditated on the ease of making, and finding, criticism of the arts in an online world. As someone whose opinions, strongly held, are often enough mistaken for and attacked for being Statements Of Inerrant Fact, I was struck by midcentury monadnock John Updike's reasonable requests of reviewers as quoted in Popova's article:
My rules, drawn up inwardly when l embarked on this craft, and shaped intaglio–fashion by youthful traumas at the receiving end of critical opinion, were and are:While I will never at all understand the spoilerphobia of so very many people, I will do my best to honor it. Someone, I promise you, will *al*ways* find fault and screech "spoiler" at the most innocuous-to-my-eyes things. They, being Gravely Injured, feel free to vent copious spleen upon the perp of the heinous crime. I'm tired of hearing their collective mouth, so I am making ever more serious efforts not to give away important points. I accept that I will, from time to time, fail in someone vocal's eyes. C'est la guerre.
1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.
2. Give him enough direct quotation—at least one extended passage—of the book's prose so the review's reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.
3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy precis.
4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending. (How astounded and indignant was I, when innocent, to find reviewers blabbing, and with the sublime inaccuracy of drunken lords reporting on a peasants' revolt, all the turns of my suspenseful and surpriseful narrative! Most ironically, the only readers who approach a book as the author intends, unpolluted by pre-knowledge of the plot, are the detested reviewers themselves. And then, years later, the blessed fool who picks the volume at random from a library shelf.)
5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author's ouevre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it's his and not yours?
To these concrete five might be added a vaguer sixth, having to do with maintaining a chemical purity in the reaction between product and appraiser. Do not accept for review a book you are predisposed to dislike, or committed by friendship to like. (emphasis added because damn, this is important!) Do not imagine yourself a caretaker of any tradition, an enforcer of any party standards, a warrior in an ideological battle, a corrections officer of any kind. Never, never (John Aldridge, Norman Podhoretz) try to put the author 'in his place,' making him a pawn in a contest with other reviewers. Review the book, not the reputation. Submit to whatever spell, weak or strong, is being cast. Better to praise and share than blame and ban. The communion between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys in reading, and all our discriminations should curve toward that end.
Here's a funny thing about writing about someone else's writing: Who cares? Why read reviews? Who asked you, as a former friend snarled at me once. I am not an academically trained critic; I follow no school of literary theory in writing about the books authors, publishers, and librarians give me, or that I buy with my very own United States dollars. What I do is called "reader response" criticism, a school of thought that has at its heart the silly idea that the reader, as opposed to the writer or the writer's intent, or the writer's execution, of the work is central to understanding the value of it.
I think of the reader as the source of the value a book has, not the writer or her unknowable (in my eyes) "intent." So I tell you what I felt about the book. I almost always use extended passages of the author's own prose in making my points. In short works that is sometimes impractical; in some cases it's simply impossible, like the extremely long single sentence that is Ducks, Newburyport (which I adored five stars'-worth but was unable to figure out how to review). I judge a book's success or failure based on how well it did the job of involving me, entertaining me, educating me; sometimes all of those things (and more) at the same time. Why is that valuable, I've been asked ("Who asked you" as mentioned above); yeah, so? seems to be the sneering tone I'm meant to hear.
There are, without exaggeration, hundreds of thousands of new, newly translated, newly re-translated, revised editions of books made available each and every year. I don't mean to alarm you, but the inescapable conclusion one must reach from that datum is that there are a whole helluva lotta books you will never hear about, let alone read. So let my biblioholism and seven-decade and counting lifetime of eclectic reading help you identify one or two you really shouldn't miss. I don't use affiliate links; I am unpaid by anyone; there's no advertising here. You'll get my opinion of a book's success or failure at its job, which is to impact me positively in the manner I procured it to do.
That opinion, being mine, is only of value to you if you know what it is; thereafter you can judge for yourself if your taste is close to mine, far from mine, on a different plane of existence from mine, and weigh your purchases or library holds accordingly. Hey, it's free! No ads to ignore, no secret commissions to cynically smirk about, zip zero nada rien requested or required from you. I hope you'll find my writing amusing as well as informative. I always love blog members leaving notes about what they agree or disagree with, but it's not required since you don't need to join up in order to read up.
So take what I'm freely offering with whatever sized salt measure suits you, strap on your anti-sarcasm armor, sharpen your Fork of Facetiousness, and ride!
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
A quick note.
I've been gone for a while, some nasty health challenges are at last clearing up...goddesses please bless the drug industry for its many successes!...but one thing, or more precisely two things, happened in December and January that reduced my desire to do this unpaid and non-commercial blog thing.
I got snarked at by A Famous Author on Facebook for calling out authors on what he was pleased to call "your mediocre reviews" (his had four stars lest you think I was making a point of being rude to him) and two weeks later on Twitter another Famous SF Author snapped about the way people "who think they're being helpful" by highlighting typos and the like, when all it does is cause Amazon to list that product as problematic.
Well, gents, a giant "fuck you" to reviewing your books, and the crappy, badly edited, typo-ridden books of indie authors. As to whom I'm intending to help, it ain't the author who can't or won't or doesn't think she needs to hire a copyeditor and a proofreader. They're different, equally important jobs; neither should be loaded onto a developmental editor, whose art is making your story better, not your book salable.
Can't afford it? Don't publish until you can. Publish anyway? Fix the errors your readers have alerted you to.
And belt the fuck up about how anyone who's paid for your book "owes" or "should" review it at all, still less only positively. No one owes you dick. You wrote the best book you could? Gold star, muffin, now put it in a drawer and glow with pleasure at this not inconsiderable achievement. Enter it into the commercial world and you're going to have to play by that world's rules.
Among those is the golden one: Value for dollars. An ebook is about as much as a fast-food burger. A paperback is about as much as an entrée at Applebee's. A hardcover's about what an entrée costs at a hotel restaurant. You'd better give me at least that much value or I am gonna tell the world you didn't.
I want to be clear: I do not have any income stream from book reviewing by my choice. When I've written reviews for other venues, they are and will be unpaid. I can't afford to make money because the US disability system says I must be in abject, unending poverty to have access to my Social Security payments (at less than half of what they would be if I'd retired on time). I ***hate*** advertising, so I'm not going to attempt to monetize this little tiny blog. So there's no reason for me try for huge readership, or to seek out the rare paying gigs that career writers BADLY NEED. I review books because I'm a tsundoku-suffering biblioholic without the slightest will or desire to be "cured" of my addiction. So here I am, asking you to read my reader-response reviews of books I've liked, loved, or (infrequently) loathed. There's no need for me to trim my cloth to the needs of others, and I won't, but the sheer noxious idiocy of saying in public that readers owe anything except the purchase price of the book to the author, or that a reviewer shouldn't say to a writer "I liked your book!" by mentioning that they've written a review of it, is something I won't let pass unchallenged.
Happier topics: 2019 was a *stellar* reading year! For the first time ever, I had two six-stars-of-five reads: Black Light: Stories, a debut story collection that gave me so much pleasure I read it twice (ever rarer occurance that), and the wrenching, gutting agony of Heart Berries, a memoir of such honesty and such vulnerability that I was a wreck after I finished it. I went back and forth a dozen times, first Author Parsons was the sixer, then Author Mailhot; neither book could possibly "win" for long because I couldn't get either book out of my mind.
I handed out 34 5- or damn-near-5-star reviews out of 155 reviewed books on LibraryThing and/or Goodreads; that's 22% of the total and that is a LOT. Many, even most of these (10+) were for short stories, for end-of-beloved-series novels, or for story collections. But hold on to something heavy: TWO, yes that's t-w-o dos due deux zwei два were...POETRY COLLECTIONS. Sarah Tolmie's The Art of Dying and the late Frank Stanford's collected poems, What About This: Collected Poems of Frank Stanford. Both were peak reading experiences. Another was cultural monadnock George Takei's graphic memoir They Called Us Enemy, which could not be more important for young people today to absorb.
What a beautiful year it was, to bring so many delights to my door. I hope, greedy thing that I am, that 2020 will repeat this performance. For all of us, really...honest! I didn't just add that on the end of this summing-up to make it sound less solipsistic.
In 2020, I wanted to post 10 book reviews a month on my blog. As of 26 February, I haven't posted a-one! The mitigating factors, some anyway, are listed above; but I need to get this train rollin' or the deficit will become daunting quickly. Even so, I still read a story every other day, as 2019's total of 155 (a lot of individual stories don't have entries in the sites' databases so I didn't post them individually; guess I should do more to sync the data this year) reads shows; so it's doable, and I've done better than that in the past.
I will Pearl Rule books I'm not enjoying with notes on Goodreads & LibraryThing about why I'm abandoning the read.
...and that's me done. My reports will continue to be quarterly here, the day after the end of the quarter.
Saturday, April 13, 2013
REASONABLE DOUBTS, third Guido Guerrieri procedural set in Bari, Italy
REASONABLE DOUBTS
GIANRICO CAROFIGLIO (Guido Guerrieri #3) {tr. Howard Curtis}
Bitter Lemon Press
$9.99 Kindle edition, available now
Rating: 4.9* of five
The Publisher Says: Lawyer Guerrieri is asked to handle the appeal of Fabio Paolicelli, sentenced to sixteen years for smuggling drugs into Italy. Everything seems stacked against the accused, not least because he initially confessed to the crime. His past as a neo-fascist thug also adds credence to the case against him. Only the intervention of Paolicelli’s beautiful half-Japanese wife finally overcomes Guerrieri’s reluctance. Matters get more complicated when Guerrieri ends up in bed with her. Gianrico Carofiglio, born in 1961, is a judge and anti-Mafia prosecutor in the southern Italian city of Bari. Bitter Lemon Press introduced him to English-speaking readers with his best-selling debut novel, Involuntary Witness.
Book One review — Book Two review — Book Four review — Book Five review
THIS BOOK WAS BORROWED VIA INTERLIBRARY LOAN. SUPPORT YOUR LIBRARY!
My Review: Third in the Guido Guerrieri Italian legal procedural thrillers, this outing finds Avv. Guerrieri tilting at windmills again, with a twist: He's running an investigation into the client's story. He's taken the case of an imprisoned drug courier who insists he's innocent of knowingly transporting 40 kilos of cocaine from Montenegro back to Bari in the car carrying himself, his wife, and their small daughter. He was a small-time crook before, yes, and (unknown to the client) was even a nasty Fascist gang-bully in the 1970s who beat young Guido up in the street. But to imperil his own wife and daughter by doing something so stupid as to run a hundred pounds of cocaine across international borders?! Never!
But word in the prison-yard is that Avv. Guerrieri is a good one, a lawyer who does the job he's hired for, and makes the case work for the client. This time, though, Guido faces something a little bit tougher than just a client probably guilty and just denying it out of embarrassment at involving his family, or even the long-ago beating he got at the client's hands (which the client's clearly forgotten): Don Quixote de Guerrieri has met his Dulcinea, the client's beautiful half-Japanese wife Natsu.
And here Guido Guerrieri is, single and everything, since Margherita left for New York and a new life (the rat!). And here Natsu is, unsure of her husband's innocence, unsure of her future, unsure of how to tell her daughter that Papa's not coming home from his business trip until 2025...what can you expect a woman to do when a handsome older gent with sad eyes and a penchant for reading strange books, a sophisticated palate that can really appreciate her cooking, and a way with soothing her deeply unhappy daughter's nightmares falls into her lap?
In the end, as always, Guido sees justice served, and sees his services amply rewarded in the process by solidifying his excellent reputation among the criminal classes, with the local narcotics officers, and the Italian judiciary, all at the same time. Not for the first time, Carofiglio weaves a believable resolution to a plot he seems to have set in motion specifically to challenge the clockwork universe into crushing our Don Quixote hero with the windmill blades.
At the end of the last book, Guido and Margherita were celebrating Christmas together! He'd even jumped out of a plane to impress her! And in one short passage at the very beginning of this book, Carofiglio dispatches her to the same place that all happy-making things go in the lives of hard-boiled sleuths. I was a little bit surprised at first, then I remembered the cardinal rule of noir: No one is happy for long.
A doomed affair with a client's wife is a great noir touch, too. No one even moderately sentient can doubt for a second that, once Natsu appears, Guido's going to succumb to her and that she's going to offer up the goods. All progresses apace, and the expected complications ensue; and perhaps that's why this installment isn't quite so thrilling to me as the previous two. I suspect that the far greater emphasis on the investigative parts of the case as opposed to the actual court arguments and examinations might contribute to my lack of superhappy. But the elements are there, just in smaller proportion to previous outings. All I can hope is that the series doesn't become all PI instead of procedural.
I really like the translations of these books, I must say, since they give me credit for being intelligent enough to need the occasional reinforcement of the book's Italian setting by using actual Italian in some non-critical but very practical ways. My favorite example is the characters calling each other, when culturally necessary for them to do so, by their job titles, eg Guido being called "Avvocato" or "Lawyer-man" in professional contexts, exactly as they would in Italy. Grace notes like this are very important to my sense of pleasure in a book, and greatly enhance my willingness to read more of the series.
I continue to enjoy these books, and wait eagerly for the next installment. That's saying something from a man whose "to be read" shelf has over 1000 titles on it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















